Zuckerberg Advocates for Democratic Access to Superintelligence Against Centralization in Few Institutions

Zuckerberg argued that the true challenge of the era is who will have access to superintelligence, not whether it will exist. He defended that technology should be distributed and not controlled by a small number of laboratories working closely with administrative structures. According to Zuckerberg, power concentration allows these institutions to control which capabilities are accessible, influencing what can be said, known, and created. The executive noted that the history of open-source software demonstrates that transparency and broad access produce real security and resilience, while centralized alternatives like approval bureaucracies tend to generate regulatory capture. For Zuckerberg, personal superintelligence in everyone's hands, with competing models and real data sovereignty, is better protection against dystopian scenarios than self-appointed guardians claiming to be aligned with humanity.